← Back to Apply Scripture — Church of Christ
Other ways you may hear this claim (1)
CASE CLOSED — COC LIBRARYSearchBible Verse Index
1 Corinthians · 1 Corinthians 13:10

Miraculous Gifts Ceased When the Bible Was Completed

Start with the short answer, then follow the Bible evidence.

THE CLAIM

Miraculous Gifts Ceased When the Bible Was Completed

SHORT ANSWER

First Corinthians 13:10 is read as the completed New Testament canon, so miraculous gifts are said to have ceased.

WHAT WOULD HAVE TO BE TRUE

To make this a salvation condition, the argument must prove more than that baptism is commanded or closely associated with conversion. It must prove that Scripture requires the conclusion stated in this claim: Miraculous Gifts Ceased When the Bible Was Completed.

Quick Bible Check
1 — The claim: Miraculous Gifts Ceased When the Bible Was Completed
2 — What it would have to show: To make this a salvation condition, the argument must prove more than that baptism is commanded or closely associated with conversion. It must prove that Scripture requires the conclusion stated in this claim: Miraculous Gifts Ceased When the Bible Was Completed.
4 — Answer: First Corinthians 13:10 is read as the completed New Testament canon, so miraculous gifts are said to have ceased.

FULL BIBLE ANSWER

Quick Answers

What Is CENI? Command, Example, and Necessary Inference

CENI is a common abbreviation for Command, Example, and Necessary Inference, a method often used in Churches of Christ to decide what the New Testament authorizes.

SHORT ANSWER

CENI means Command, Example, and Necessary Inference. A command is something Scripture tells believers to do. An approved apostolic example is a pattern shown in New Testament practice. A necessary inference is a conclusion the stated evidence actually forces.

Where the Problem Begins

Commands and examples matter, and inference is unavoidable. The danger begins when a possible inference is promoted to a necessary inference and then treated as though God stated it directly.

For example, the fact that Philip preached Jesus and the eunuch soon asked for water proves prompt baptism belonged to the response to Christ. It does not necessarily prove that Philip had just taught, “You remain eternally unforgiven until the instant of immersion.” That extra proposition must be established, not inserted.

IMPORTANT: Necessary inference means the evidence forces the conclusion. “This reading fits my system” is not the same thing.

Why CENI Matters in the Baptism Debate

The site tests claims such as “one church means our restoration movement,” “silence forbids instruments,” and “every conversion example proves water is the saving boundary.” Each claim may involve inference. The question is whether the inference is truly necessary.

See: Acts 8:35-38, Acts 10:43-48, Acts 15:7-9, Romans 16:16, Ephesians 4:4-5.

27. Miracles and “That Which Is Perfect”

THE CLAIM

This claim identifies “that which is perfect” in 1 Corinthians 13:10 as the completed Word and says miraculous gifts therefore ceased.

NOT PROVED BY THE TEXT

1 Corinthians 13:10 — “But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” The word “Word” is not in the verse. The TR has to teleion — “that which is perfect/complete.” A cessationist conclusion may be argued from a larger biblical theology of signs, apostles, revelation, and confirmation, but this verse itself does not identify “the perfect” as the completed New Testament canon.

The argument also moves from skepticism toward modern miracle claims to the universal statement that all who claim miracles today are liars. Scripture commands testing the spirits and exposes false signs, but that universal accusation is stronger than the cited texts establish.

CLEARLY STATED

Parenthetical insertions are not inspired words. A disputed cessationist identification must not be printed inside the verse as though Paul supplied it.

ILLUSTRATION FROM NOT BY WATER — Barabbas

Barabbas is a picture of substitution: the guilty man goes free while the innocent Christ is condemned. The illustration does not tell us whether Barabbas believed. It shows where the saving weight belongs — on the Substitute, not on something the guilty man performs to complete the exchange.

BOTTOM LINE

Test the claim by the text it cites. Where the inference goes beyond what Scripture states, the inference must not be made a condition of salvation or fellowship.